10% pricier ≈ $600
- Storage (base) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Razr 60 Ultra — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Razr 60 Ultra
43% pricier ≈ $780
- Battery capacity 5,165 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Wireless charging power 50 W vs 30 W
- Main camera aperture f/1.7 vs f/1.8
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Peak brightness 3,200 nits vs 4,500 nits
69% pricier ≈ $920
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Telephoto camera
- AnTuTu score 1,883,303 vs 1,831,189
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Active use (test) 13.3 h vs 15.2 h
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- AnTuTu score 2,270,288 vs 1,831,189
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,650 vs 6,796
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
71% pricier ≈ $930
- Optical zoom 5× vs 2×
- Telephoto camera
- Battery capacity 5,015 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Wired charging 30 W vs 68 W
- AnTuTu score 1,553,009 vs 1,831,189
32% pricier ≈ $720
- Telephoto camera
- Weight 190 g vs 199 g
- Main camera aperture f/1.7 vs f/1.8
- Wireless charging
- AnTuTu score 1,609,570 vs 1,831,189
10% pricier ≈ $600
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,433 vs 6,796
- Battery charge cycles 2,000 vs 1,000
- Drop resistance class A vs D
- Wired charging 25 W vs 68 W
- AnTuTu score 1,513,134 vs 1,831,189
78% pricier ≈ $970
- Telephoto camera
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Wired charging 80 W vs 68 W
- Wireless charging
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
74% pricier ≈ $950
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- Telephoto camera
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,152 vs 6,796
- Wired charging 25 W vs 68 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
98% pricier ≈ $1,100
- Battery capacity 6,560 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Screen size 8″ vs 7″
- Resolution (width) 2,200 px vs 1,224 px
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx8