- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Flip7
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (21) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display5.3
8.4Performance7.2
6.6Camera4.9
8.4Battery4.6
8.4Features9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraGalaxy Z Flip7
| Razr 60 Ultra | Galaxy Z Flip7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 166.7 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.5 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 188 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Flip7?
- Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,513,134+21%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+9%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
- Active use (test)15.2 h vs 11.9 h+28%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+31%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 7,433+9%
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 2,0002×
- Drop resistance classD vs A
- Weight199 g vs 188 g+6%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.5 mm+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 88.7%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.5 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 166.7 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Blue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 397 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | 1,471 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 88.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Exynos 2500 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Xclipse 950 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | 1,513,134 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | 7,433 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | 5,636 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -26.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.69 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | 42 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | D | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 29.18.7
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9.15.0
vs
Xiaomi Mix FlipvsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.19.1
vs
Honor Magic V Flip 2vsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.99.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip66.96.4
