How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 60 Ultra vs X Fold3

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold3

What Razr 60 Ultra does better (10) and where X Fold3 wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra
9.1Score
10 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
vs
Vivo X Fold3
Vivo · 2024X Fold3
8.8Score
9 advantages≈ $970
9.6Display9.4
6.6Camera7.4
8.4Battery8.8
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 60 UltraX Fold3
74 × 171.57.2142.7 × 1604.7
Razr 60 UltraX Fold3Difference
Height171.5 mm160 mm+11.5 mm
Width74 mm142.7 mm−68.7 mm
Thickness7.2 mm4.7 mm+2.5 mm
Weight199 g219 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than X Fold3?

  1. Wireless chargingYes · X Fold3: No
  2. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  3. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%
  4. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold3: No
  6. eSIMYes · X Fold3: No
  7. Pixel density464 ppi vs 413 ppi+12%
  8. Weight199 g vs 219 g+10%
  9. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  10. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%

Why is X Fold3 better than Razr 60 Ultra?

  1. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 60 Ultra: Yes
  2. Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+17%
  3. Wired charging68 W vs 80 W+18%
  4. Screen size7″ vs 8″+15%
  5. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 2,200 px+80%
  6. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  7. Thickness7.2 mm vs 4.7 mm+53%
  8. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  9. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 90.5%+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X Fold3Vivo X Fold3≈ $9708.8
Design
Weight199 g219 g
Thickness7.2 mm4.7 mm
Height171.5 mm160 mm
Width74 mm142.7 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackSilicone polymer—
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass-Keramik—
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretBlack, White
Display
Screen size7″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px2,200 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,480 px
Pixel density464 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness1,489 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%90.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,831,189—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,938—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.49"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom2×2×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh5,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)15.2 h—
Wired charging68 W80 W
Charged in 30 min78%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.5 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UIOriginOS 4
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle49 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classD—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare