- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Razr 60 Ultra
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
What Pixel 10 Pro Fold does better (12) and where Razr 60 Ultra wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display9.6
7.6Performance8.4
8.0Camera6.6
6.7Battery8.4
9.3Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 10 Pro FoldRazr 60 Ultra
| Pixel 10 Pro Fold | Razr 60 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 155.2 mm | 171.5 mm | −16.3 mm |
| Width | 150.4 mm | 74 mm | +76.4 mm |
| Thickness | 5.2 mm | 7.2 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 258 g | 199 g | +59 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 10 Pro Fold better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Razr 60 Ultra: No
- Battery capacity5,015 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+7%
- Drop resistance classA vs D
- Screen size8″ vs 7″+14%
- Resolution (width)2,076 px vs 1,224 px+70%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness5.2 mm vs 7.2 mm+38%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.4% vs 84.1%+5%
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Pixel 10 Pro Fold?
- Wired charging30 W vs 68 W2.3×
- AnTuTu score1,553,009 vs 1,831,189+18%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,173 vs 6,796+10%
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 50 MP5×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Weight258 g vs 199 g+30%
- Pixel density374 ppi vs 464 ppi+24%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 30 W2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 258 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 5.2 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 155.2 mm | 171.5 mm |
| Width | 150.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass-Keramik |
| Colours | Moonstone, Jade | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,076 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,152 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 374 ppi | 464 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,489 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.4% | 84.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G5 | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.78 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,553,009 | 1,831,189 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,173 | 6,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 5,938 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,015 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 15.2 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 78% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 48 h | 49 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | A | D |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold78.58.1vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsVivo X Fold58.59.0vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold8.57.4vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsXiaomi Mix Flip 28.58.7vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsHonor Magic V Flip 28.58.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9