How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 60 Ultra vs Mix Flip

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mix Flip

What Razr 60 Ultra does better (16) and where Mix Flip wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra
9.1Score
16 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Flip
8.1Score
4 advantages≈ $720
9.6Display7.7
8.4Performance7.4
6.6Camera6.4
8.4Battery7.0
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 60 UltraMix Flip
74 × 171.57.274 × 167.57.6
Razr 60 UltraMix FlipDifference
Height171.5 mm167.5 mm+4 mm
Width74 mm74 mm=
Thickness7.2 mm7.6 mm−0.4 mm
Weight199 g190 g+9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Mix Flip?

  1. Wireless chargingYes · Mix Flip: No
  2. AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,609,570+14%
  3. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  4. Active use (test)15.2 h vs 12 h+27%
  5. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 6,035+13%
  7. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,938 vs 4,209+41%
  8. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+31%
  9. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Mix Flip: No
  10. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  11. eSIMYes · Mix Flip: No
  12. Measured brightness1,489 nits vs 1,314 nits+13%

Why is Mix Flip better than Razr 60 Ultra?

  1. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 60 Ultra: Yes
  2. Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
  3. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 87.5%+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Mix FlipXiaomi Mix Flip≈ $7208.1
Design
Weight199 g190 g
Thickness7.2 mm7.6 mm
Height171.5 mm167.5 mm
Width74 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass-Keramik—
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretBlack, White, Purple
Display
Screen size7″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,912 px
Pixel density464 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,489 nits1,314 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%87.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 750
AnTuTu score1,831,1891,609,570
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,7966,035
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,9384,209
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom2×2×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh4,780 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)15.2 h12 h
Wired charging68 W67 W
Charged in 30 min78%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.5 LUFS-27.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UIHyperOS 3
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle49 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classD—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare