android.gs
Compare
Razr 60 Ultra vs Nubia Fold

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs ZTE Nubia Fold

What Razr 60 Ultra does better (10) and where Nubia Fold wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra

9.1Score

10 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

ZTE · 2025Nubia Fold

8.2Score

6 advantages≈ $1,100

9.6Display8.8

6.6Camera6.7

8.4Battery8.1

8.4Features5.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 60 UltraNubia Fold

	Razr 60 Ultra	Nubia Fold	Difference
Height	171.5 mm	160 mm	+11.5 mm
Width	74 mm	144 mm	−70 mm
Thickness	7.2 mm	5.4 mm	+1.8 mm
Weight	199 g	249 g	−50 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Nubia Fold?

Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Wireless chargingYes · Nubia Fold: No
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Wired charging68 W vs 55 W+24%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
Weight199 g vs 249 g+25%
4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
Pixel density464 ppi vs 414 ppi+12%

Why is Nubia Fold better than Razr 60 Ultra?

Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 6,560 mAh+40%
Screen size7″ vs 8″+14%
Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 2,200 px+80%
Thickness7.2 mm vs 5.4 mm+33%
Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 89%+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 60 Ultra≈ $5409.1	ZTE Nubia Fold≈ $1,1008.2
Design
Weight	199 g	249 g
Thickness	7.2 mm	5.4 mm
Height	171.5 mm	160 mm
Width	74 mm	144 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Silicone polymer	—
Ingress protection	IP48	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass-Keramik	—
Colours	Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret	Black
Display
Screen size	7″	8″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	2,200 px
Resolution (height)	2,912 px	2,480 px
Pixel density	464 ppi	414 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,489 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	84.1%	89%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	4.32 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Adreno 830	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	1,831,189	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,796	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	5,938	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	—
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,700 mAh	6,560 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Active use (test)	15.2 h	—
Wired charging	68 W	55 W
Charged in 30 min	78%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	30 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.5 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	49 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	D	—