- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Razr Ultra 2025
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (0) and where Razr Ultra 2025 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.6
6.6Camera8.8
8.4Battery8.0
8.4Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraRazr Ultra 2025
| Razr 60 Ultra | Razr Ultra 2025 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 171.5 mm | = |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.2 mm | = |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Razr Ultra 2025?
Razr 60 Ultra has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 171.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 464 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
