- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold7
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (16) and where Galaxy Z Fold7 wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display5.7
8.4Performance8.6
6.6Camera9.0
8.4Battery4.4
8.4Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraGalaxy Z Fold7
| Razr 60 Ultra | Galaxy Z Fold7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 158.4 mm | +13.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 143.2 mm | −69.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 4.2 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Fold7?
- Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Active use (test)15.2 h vs 11.7 h+30%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+7%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
- Pixel density464 ppi vs 368 ppi+26%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Wireless charging power30 W vs 15 W2×
- Energy classA vs B
- Repairability classB vs C
- Weight199 g vs 215 g+8%
Why is Galaxy Z Fold7 better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 60 Ultra: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 9,152+35%
- AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,995,132+9%
- Optical zoom2× vs 3×+50%
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 2,0002×
- Drop resistance classD vs A
- Screen size7″ vs 8″+14%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 4.2 mm+71%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+3%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,968 px+61%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 4.2 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 158.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 143.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet Black, Mint |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,968 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,184 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 368 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | 1,408 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | 1,995,132 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | 9,152 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | 5,952 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | 11.7 h |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.42 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | 40 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | D | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 29.18.7
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9.15.0
vs
Xiaomi Mix FlipvsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.19.1
vs
Honor Magic V Flip 2vsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.99.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold78.88.1
