Same price ≈ $600
- Wired charging 68 W vs 25 W
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Weight 199 g vs 188 g
- CPU cores 8 vs 10
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Galaxy Z Flip7 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Galaxy Z Flip7
9% cheaper ≈ $540
- Wired charging 68 W vs 25 W
- AnTuTu score 1,831,189 vs 1,513,134
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,796 vs 7,433
- Battery charge cycles 1,000 vs 2,000
29% pricier ≈ $780
- Wired charging 67 W vs 25 W
- Battery capacity 5,165 mAh vs 4,300 mAh
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- eSIM
- Weight 199 g vs 188 g
17% pricier ≈ $700
- Battery capacity 4,500 mAh vs 4,300 mAh
- Wired charging 30 W vs 25 W
- Selfie camera 32 MP vs 10 MP
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 2,559 vs 7,433
- AnTuTu score 886,677 vs 1,513,134
25% pricier ≈ $750
- Battery capacity 4,800 mAh vs 4,300 mAh
- Wired charging 30 W vs 25 W
- Selfie camera 32 MP vs 10 MP
- RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 512 GB
55% pricier ≈ $930
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Telephoto camera
- Battery capacity 5,015 mAh vs 4,300 mAh
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,173 vs 7,433
- Weight 258 g vs 188 g
10% cheaper ≈ $540
- Wired charging 45 W vs 25 W
- Telephoto camera
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Major OS updates promised 3 vs 7
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,441 vs 7,433
13% cheaper ≈ $530
- Pixel density 426 ppi vs 397 ppi
- RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 512 GB
36% cheaper ≈ $380
- Wired charging 45 W vs 25 W
- Telephoto camera
- AnTuTu score 1,794,400 vs 1,513,134
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,989 vs 7,433
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 512 GB
15% pricier ≈ $690
- Wired charging 66 W vs 25 W
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Battery capacity 4,800 mAh vs 4,300 mAh
- Wireless charging
- eSIM