android.gs
Compare
Galaxy Z Flip7 vs Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

What Galaxy Z Flip7 does better (17) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 FE wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7

6.9Score

17 advantages≈ $600

Higher score

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

6.2Score

1 advantage≈ $530

5.3Display5.8

7.2Performance6.1

4.9Camera4.0

4.6Battery3.0

9.6Features8.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Z Flip7Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

	Galaxy Z Flip7	Galaxy Z Flip7 FE	Difference
Height	166.7 mm	165.1 mm	+1.6 mm
Width	75.2 mm	71.9 mm	+3.3 mm
Thickness	6.5 mm	6.9 mm	−0.4 mm
Weight	188 g	187 g	+1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 better than Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
AnTuTu score1,513,134 vs 1,355,845+12%
Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+7%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,433 vs 6,108+22%
Active use (test)11.9 h vs 10.2 h+17%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,636 vs 4,036+40%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
Battery charge cycles2,000 vs 1,700+18%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better than Galaxy Z Flip7?

Pixel density397 ppi vs 426 ppi+7%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7≈ $6006.9	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE≈ $5306.2
Design
Weight	188 g	187 g
Thickness	6.5 mm	6.9 mm
Height	166.7 mm	165.1 mm
Width	75.2 mm	71.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP48	IP48
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus 2	Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	Blue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint	Black, White
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.7″
Panel	Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X	Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,520 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	397 ppi	426 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,600 nits	2,600 nits
Measured brightness	1,471 nits	1,444 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.7%	85.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2500	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	Exynos	Exynos
Process	3 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	10	10
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 950	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	1,513,134	1,355,845
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	7,433	6,108
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	5,636	4,036
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Optical zoom	—	2×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	10 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,300 mAh	4,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.9 h	10.2 h
Wired charging	25 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	50%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.2	3.2
Video output	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.1 LUFS	-26.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	0.69 W/kg	0.84 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	One UI 8
Major OS updates promised	7	7
EU label
Energy class	B	B
Battery charge cycles	2,000	1,700
Endurance per cycle	42 h	37 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	A	A