- android.gs
- Compare
- Magic V Flip vs Galaxy Z Flip7
Honor Magic V Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
What Magic V Flip does better (8) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display5.3
6.3Camera4.9
7.1Battery4.6
4.7Features9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Magic V FlipGalaxy Z Flip7
| Magic V Flip | Galaxy Z Flip7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.3 mm | 166.7 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 75.2 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.5 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 188 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Magic V Flip better than Galaxy Z Flip7?
- Wired charging66 W vs 25 W2.6×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+12%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
- Wireless charging power40 W vs 15 W2.7×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 2,600 nits+15%
- Charged in 30 min90% vs 50%+80%
Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 better than Magic V Flip?
- Wireless chargingNo · Magic V Flip: Yes
- eSIMNo · Magic V Flip: Yes
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+10%
- Weight193 g vs 188 g+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.5 mm+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.4% vs 88.7%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.5 mm |
| Height | 167.3 mm | 166.7 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Black, White, Champagne, Green | Blue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,520 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 397 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,471 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | 88.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Exynos 2500 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Xclipse 950 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,513,134 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,433 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 5,636 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 90% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.69 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 42 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Honor Magic V FlipvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold67.37.3
vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsHonor Magic V Flip7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip66.96.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsMotorola Razr 606.96.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip56.95.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.96.9
