android.gs
Compare
Galaxy Z Flip7 vs Mix Flip 2

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip 2

What Galaxy Z Flip7 does better (5) and where Mix Flip 2 wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7

6.9Score

5 advantages≈ $600

Xiaomi · 2025Mix Flip 2

8.7Score

12 advantages≈ $780

Higher score

5.3Display8.4

4.9Camera7.1

4.6Battery9.2

9.6Features6.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Z Flip7Mix Flip 2

	Galaxy Z Flip7	Mix Flip 2	Difference
Height	166.7 mm	166.9 mm	−0.2 mm
Width	75.2 mm	73.8 mm	+1.4 mm
Thickness	6.5 mm	7.6 mm	−1.1 mm
Weight	188 g	199 g	−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 better than Mix Flip 2?

eSIMYes · Mix Flip 2: No
Weight188 g vs 199 g+6%
USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
Thickness6.5 mm vs 7.6 mm+17%

Why is Mix Flip 2 better than Galaxy Z Flip7?

Wired charging25 W vs 67 W2.7×
Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 5,165 mAh+20%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Selfie camera10 MP vs 32 MP3.2×
Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+31%
Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 3,200 nits+23%
Max video4K vs 8K
Pixel density397 ppi vs 460 ppi+16%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7≈ $6006.9	Xiaomi Mix Flip 2≈ $7808.7
Design
Weight	188 g	199 g
Thickness	6.5 mm	7.6 mm
Height	166.7 mm	166.9 mm
Width	75.2 mm	73.8 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP48	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus 2	—
Colours	Blue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint	White, Purple, Green, Checkered Gold
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,520 px	2,912 px
Pixel density	397 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,600 nits	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	1,471 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	88.7%	88.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2500	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Exynos	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	10	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 950	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	1,513,134	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	7,433	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	5,636	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	10 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,300 mAh	5,165 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Si/C
Active use (test)	11.9 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	0.69 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	2,000	—
Endurance per cycle	42 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—