How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Ultra 2025 vs Galaxy Z Flip7

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

What Razr Ultra 2025 does better (14) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Motorola · 2025Razr Ultra 2025
9.0Score
14 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7
6.9Score
4 advantages≈ $600
9.6Display5.3
8.8Camera4.9
8.0Battery4.6
8.4Features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr Ultra 2025Galaxy Z Flip7
74 × 171.57.275.2 × 166.76.5
Razr Ultra 2025Galaxy Z Flip7Difference
Height171.5 mm166.7 mm+4.8 mm
Width74 mm75.2 mm−1.2 mm
Thickness7.2 mm6.5 mm+0.7 mm
Weight199 g188 g+11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than Galaxy Z Flip7?

  1. Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
  2. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+9%
  6. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
  7. Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
  8. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+31%
  9. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  10. Max video8K vs 4K
  11. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  12. Wireless charging power30 W vs 15 W2×

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 better than Razr Ultra 2025?

  1. Weight199 g vs 188 g+6%
  2. CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
  3. Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.5 mm+11%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 88.7%+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight199 g188 g
Thickness7.2 mm6.5 mm
Height171.5 mm166.7 mm
Width74 mm75.2 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretBlue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint
Display
Screen size7″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,520 px
Pixel density464 ppi397 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits2,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,471 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%88.7%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteExynos 2500
Chip makerQualcommExynos
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores810
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Xclipse 950
AnTuTu score—1,513,134
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—7,433
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,636
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.57"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh4,300 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—11.9 h
Wired charging68 W25 W
Charged in 30 min—50%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.69 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 9
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—2,000
Endurance per cycle—42 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare