- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A23 vs Pova 4
Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Tecno Pova 4
What Galaxy A23 does better (12) and where Pova 4 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display4.4
3.2Performance4.0
7.6Camera4.6
5.3Battery7.0
5.0Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A23Pova 4
| Galaxy A23 | Pova 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.4 mm | 170.6 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 77.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.7 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 214 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A23 better than Pova 4?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 4: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 257 ppi+56%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4: No
- Weight195 g vs 214 g+10%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Peak brightness460 nits vs 450 nits+2%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Charged in 30 min32% vs 25%+28%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.7 mm+4%
Why is Pova 4 better than Galaxy A23?
- AnTuTu score273,554 vs 540,584+98%
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A23: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.5% vs 84.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 165.4 mm | 170.6 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 257 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 460 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 464 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.5% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 273,554 | 540,584 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,632 | 1,640 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 343 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 32% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.36 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | HiOS 12 |
