- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 4 vs Redmi Note 11
Tecno Pova 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
What Pova 4 does better (5) and where Redmi Note 11 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Display7.1
4.0Performance2.9
4.6Camera6.2
7.0Battery6.0
5.6Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 4Redmi Note 11
| Pova 4 | Redmi Note 11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.6 mm | 159.9 mm | +10.7 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 73.9 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 179 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 4 better than Redmi Note 11?
- AnTuTu score540,584 vs 228,0442.4×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
Why is Redmi Note 11 better than Pova 4?
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,000 nits2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Pova 4: Yes
- Pixel density257 ppi vs 409 ppi+59%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pova 4: Yes
- Charged in 30 min25% vs 50%2×
- Weight214 g vs 179 g+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 170.6 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 73.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 257 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 736 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 540,584 | 228,044 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,640 | 1,662 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 343 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 12 | HyperOS |
