- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A23 vs Galaxy A32
Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Samsung Galaxy A32
What Galaxy A23 does better (8) and where Galaxy A32 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display6.9
3.2Performance2.6
7.6Camera7.1
5.3Battery4.0
5.0Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A23Galaxy A32
| Galaxy A23 | Galaxy A32 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.4 mm | 158.9 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 73.6 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 195 g | 184 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A23 better than Galaxy A32?
- Wired charging25 W vs 15 W+67%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy A32: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,632 vs 1,277+28%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.4″+3%
- Charged in 30 min32% vs 25%+28%
- Loudspeaker loudness-27.6 LUFS vs -30.3 LUFS+-9%
Why is Galaxy A32 better than Galaxy A23?
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy A23: Yes
- Measured brightness464 nits vs 814 nits+75%
- Peak brightness460 nits vs 800 nits+74%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- AnTuTu score273,554 vs 286,666+5%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Weight195 g vs 184 g+6%
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 411 ppi+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.5% vs 84.6%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 165.4 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 460 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 464 nits | 814 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.5% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 273,554 | 286,666 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,632 | 1,277 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 32% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.6 LUFS | -30.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.36 W/kg | 0.45 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | One UI 5 |
