- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 4 vs Redmi Note 11S
Tecno Pova 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
What Pova 4 does better (8) and where Redmi Note 11S wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Display7.1
4.0Performance2.8
4.6Camera7.1
7.0Battery6.0
5.6Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 4Redmi Note 11S
| Pova 4 | Redmi Note 11S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.6 mm | 159.9 mm | +10.7 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 73.9 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 179 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 4 better than Redmi Note 11S?
- AnTuTu score540,584 vs 251,2012.2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+7%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme343 vs 325+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 11S better than Pova 4?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,000 nits2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Pova 4: Yes
- Pixel density257 ppi vs 409 ppi+59%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,640 vs 1,873+14%
- Charged in 30 min25% vs 52%2.1×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pova 4: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight214 g vs 179 g+20%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 170.6 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 73.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey | Graphite Gray, Pearl White, Twilight Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 257 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 744 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 540,584 | 251,201 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,640 | 1,873 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 343 | 325 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.59 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 12 | MIUI 13 |
