- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A23 vs Galaxy A52
Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Samsung Galaxy A52
What Galaxy A23 does better (4) and where Galaxy A52 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display6.9
3.2Performance4.3
7.6Camera8.7
5.3Battery3.2
5.0Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A23Galaxy A52
| Galaxy A23 | Galaxy A52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.4 mm | 159.9 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 75.1 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A23 better than Galaxy A52?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- AnTuTu score273,554 vs 261,282+5%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+4%
- Process6 nm vs 8 nm+33%
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Galaxy A23?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,632 vs 5,8653.6×
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy A23: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A23: Yes
- Peak brightness460 nits vs 800 nits+74%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Measured brightness464 nits vs 794 nits+71%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Galaxy A23: Yes
- Weight195 g vs 189 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 165.4 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White, Peach, Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 460 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 464 nits | 794 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.5% | 84.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 273,554 | 261,282 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,632 | 5,865 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 313 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 32% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.6 LUFS | -27 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.36 W/kg | 0.35 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | One UI 6.1 |
