- android.gs
- Compare
- V29 Pro vs Poco F5 5G
Vivo V29 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F5 5G
What V29 Pro does better (8) and where Poco F5 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display7.6
8.4Camera8.4
4.8Battery7.2
4.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
V29 ProPoco F5 5G
| V29 Pro | Poco F5 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 161.1 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 181 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V29 Pro better than Poco F5 5G?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F5 5G: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits+30%
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 395 ppi+15%
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz+7%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,080 px+17%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.9 mm+5%
Why is Poco F5 5G better than V29 Pro?
- NFCNo · V29 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · V29 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Weight188 g vs 181 g+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.8% vs 93.4%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,029 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 93.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | 682,257 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,999 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 83% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 1.17 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 | MIUI 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
