- android.gs
- Compare
- V29 Pro vs V40 Pro
Vivo V29 Pro vs Vivo V40 Pro
What V29 Pro does better (2) and where V40 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V29 ProV40 Pro
| V29 Pro | V40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.1 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.6 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 192 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V29 Pro better than V40 Pro?
- Weight188 g vs 192 g+2%
- Charged in 30 min83% vs 73%+14%
Why is V40 Pro better than V29 Pro?
- AnTuTu score682,257 vs 1,504,7982.2×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits3.5×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- NFCNo · V29 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · V29 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,999 vs 5,149+29%
- Active use (test)12.1 h vs 13.8 h+14%
- Measured brightness1,029 nits vs 1,307 nits+27%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · V29 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink | Ganges Blue, Titanium Gray, Moonlight White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,029 nits | 1,307 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 89.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 682,257 | 1,504,798 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,999 | 5,149 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,908 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 12.1 h | 13.8 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 83% | 73% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | -26 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.17 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
