- android.gs
- Compare
- V25 Pro vs V29 Pro
Vivo V25 Pro vs Vivo V29 Pro
What V25 Pro does better (5) and where V29 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V25 ProV29 Pro
| V25 Pro | V29 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 164.2 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 74.4 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 188 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V25 Pro better than V29 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Battery capacity4,830 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+5%
- AnTuTu score704,090 vs 682,257+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Loudspeaker loudness-27.3 LUFS vs -30 LUFS+-9%
Why is V29 Pro better than V25 Pro?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,521 vs 3,999+59%
- Telephoto cameraNo · V25 Pro: Yes
- Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
- Measured brightness805 nits vs 1,029 nits+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Pixel density398 ppi vs 453 ppi+14%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Colours | Pure Black, Sailing Blue | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 805 nits | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 90.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 704,090 | 682,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,521 | 3,999 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,830 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.3 LUFS | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.19 W/kg | 1.17 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 12 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
