- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 6 Pro vs Armor 25T
Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs UleFone Armor 25T
What Pova 6 Pro does better (11) and where Armor 25T wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display7.2
6.7Camera6.0
8.2Battery8.6
6.5Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 6 ProArmor 25T
| Pova 6 Pro | Armor 25T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 177.4 mm | −11.9 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 81.4 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 12.5 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 326 g | −128 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 6 Pro better than Armor 25T?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Wired charging70 W vs 33 W2.1×
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- OLED panelYes · Armor 25T: No
- 5GYes · Armor 25T: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 25T: No
- Weight198 g vs 326 g+65%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 12.5 mm+58%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.2% vs 75.6%+15%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/2+5%
Why is Armor 25T better than Pova 6 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Wireless chargingNo · Pova 6 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+8%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 326 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 12.5 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 177.4 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 81.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Comet Green, Meteorite Grey | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,070 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.2% | 75.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 390,556 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 373 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 14.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
