- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 40S vs Pova 6 Pro
Infinix Note 40S vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro
What Note 40S does better (4) and where Pova 6 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display8.4
6.6Camera6.6
6.8Battery8.2
5.3Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 40SPova 6 Pro
| Note 40S | Pova 6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 165.5 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.1 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 198 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 40S better than Pova 6 Pro?
- Wireless chargingYes · Pova 6 Pro: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Weight176 g vs 198 g+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.8% vs 87.2%+3%
Why is Pova 6 Pro better than Note 40S?
- Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Note 40S: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min48% vs 75%+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 176 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 165.5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Obsidian Black, Vintage Green | Comet Green, Meteorite Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,070 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 87.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 390,556 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 373 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.4 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 20 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14 | HIOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
