- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 4 Pro vs Pova 6 Pro
Tecno Pova 4 Pro vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro
What Pova 4 Pro does better (4) and where Pova 6 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display8.4
4.4Performance4.1
4.6Camera6.6
8.2Battery8.2
5.6Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 4 ProPova 6 Pro
| Pova 4 Pro | Pova 6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 165.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76.1 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 7.9 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 211 g | 198 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than Pova 6 Pro?
- AnTuTu score556,518 vs 390,556+42%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,047 vs 1,890+8%
- Pixel density403 ppi vs 393 ppi+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Pova 6 Pro better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,300 nits2.9×
- Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- 5GNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Memory card slotNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme346 vs 373+8%
- Weight211 g vs 198 g+7%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 211 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 165.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Fluorite Blue | Comet Green, Meteorite Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,070 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 87.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 556,518 | 390,556 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,047 | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 346 | 373 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.4 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 8.6 | HIOS 14 |
