- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 30 vs Pova 6 Pro
Tecno Camon 30 vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro
What Camon 30 does better (5) and where Pova 6 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display8.4
5.0Performance4.1
7.8Camera6.6
7.3Battery8.2
4.2Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 30Pova 6 Pro
| Camon 30 | Pova 6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.3 mm | 165.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 76.1 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 198 g | −0 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 30 better than Pova 6 Pro?
- AnTuTu score591,209 vs 390,556+51%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 6 Pro: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,976 vs 1,890+5%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.9 mm+3%
Why is Pova 6 Pro better than Camon 30?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- 5GNo · Camon 30: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Camon 30: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Storage (base)8 GB vs 256 GB32×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min67% vs 75%+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 165.3 mm | 165.5 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown | Comet Green, Meteorite Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,070 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3% | 87.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 591,209 | 390,556 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,976 | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 373 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 8 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.4 h |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 67% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | HIOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
