- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro vs Redmi Note 12S
Tecno Camon 20 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
What Camon 20 Pro does better (10) and where Redmi Note 12S wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.1
4.4Performance3.4
6.4Camera7.1
6.0Battery6.0
4.2Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 ProRedmi Note 12S
| Camon 20 Pro | Redmi Note 12S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 159.9 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 73.9 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 176 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than Redmi Note 12S?
- AnTuTu score574,290 vs 493,222+16%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,953 vs 1,518+29%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+7%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.1 mm+4%
Why is Redmi Note 12S better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- Weight190 g vs 176 g+8%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 409 ppi+4%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 55%+45%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 176 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 73.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Colours | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue | Onyx Black, Ice Blue, Pearl Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 631 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 574,290 | 493,222 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,953 | 1,518 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 326 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | MIUI 14 |
