- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 40 Pro vs Camon 20 Pro
Infinix Hot 40 Pro vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What Hot 40 Pro does better (4) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display7.2
4.2Performance4.4
6.6Camera6.4
5.1Battery6.0
6.2Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 40 ProCamon 20 Pro
| Hot 40 Pro | Camon 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.6 mm | 163.4 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76.7 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 40 Pro better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Charged in 30 min64% vs 38%+68%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than Hot 40 Pro?
- AnTuTu score428,551 vs 574,290+34%
- OLED panelNo · Hot 40 Pro: Yes
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.8 mm+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 168.6 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Palm Blue, Horizon Gold, Starlit Black, Starfall Green, Free Fire | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 534 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 428,551 | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,975 | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13.5 | HIOS 14 |
