- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro vs Redmi Note 12 4G
Tecno Camon 20 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
What Camon 20 Pro does better (8) and where Redmi Note 12 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display8.0
4.4Performance3.6
6.4Camera6.2
6.0Battery6.0
4.2Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 ProRedmi Note 12 4G
| Camon 20 Pro | Redmi Note 12 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 165.7 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 76 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 184 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than Redmi Note 12 4G?
- AnTuTu score574,290 vs 319,219+80%
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 12 4G: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,953 vs 1,797+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Redmi Note 12 4G better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,200 nits2.4×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- Weight190 g vs 184 g+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue | Onyx Gray, Mint Green, Ice Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 744 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 574,290 | 319,219 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,953 | 1,797 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.9 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | HyperOS |
