- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Camon 20 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (6) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display7.2
3.7Performance4.4
7.8Camera6.4
5.3Battery6.0
5.7Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GCamon 20 Pro
| Galaxy A24 4G | Camon 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 163.4 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 190 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 500 nits2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Charged in 30 min46% vs 38%+21%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- AnTuTu score398,005 vs 574,290+44%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,890 vs 1,953+3%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight195 g vs 190 g+3%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.8 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | 1,953 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HIOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
