- android.gs
- Compare
- XP10 vs Camon 20 Pro
Sonim XP10 vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What XP10 does better (7) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Display7.2
5.8Camera6.4
7.3Battery6.0
6.9Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
XP10Camon 20 Pro
| XP10 | Camon 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 163.4 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 76.7 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 16.4 mm | 7.8 mm | +8.6 mm |
| Weight | 320 g | 190 g | +130 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XP10 better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Pixel density439 ppi vs 395 ppi+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than XP10?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- OLED panelNo · XP10: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Weight320 g vs 190 g+68%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Thickness16.4 mm vs 7.8 mm2.1×
- Screen size5.5″ vs 6.7″+21%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · XP10: Yes
- Screen-to-body ratio62.6% vs 85.7%+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 320 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 16.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,160 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 439 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 62.6% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Front | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
