- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno12 F 4G vs Camon 30S
OPPO Reno12 F 4G vs Tecno Camon 30S
What Reno12 F 4G does better (13) and where Camon 30S wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display8.4
3.8Performance4.5
6.8Camera7.1
6.8Battery6.0
4.0Features3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12 F 4GCamon 30S
| Reno12 F 4G | Camon 30S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 164.5 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.6 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 195 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 F 4G better than Camon 30S?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30S: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 1,300 nits+62%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30S: No
- Weight187 g vs 195 g+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 30S better than Reno12 F 4G?
- AnTuTu score431,840 vs 576,539+34%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
- NFCNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,468 vs 1,975+35%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.9% vs 89.5%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey | Nebula Violet, Blue, Celestial Black, Dawn Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 89.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 431,840 | 576,539 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,468 | 1,975 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HIOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
