- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G35 vs Reno12 F 4G
Motorola Moto G35 vs OPPO Reno12 F 4G
What Moto G35 does better (7) and where Reno12 F 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display8.6
5.0Performance3.8
6.8Camera6.9
4.6Battery6.7
7.7Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G35Reno12 F 4G
| Moto G35 | Reno12 F 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.3 mm | 163.1 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 75.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 187 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G35 better than Reno12 F 4G?
- AnTuTu score628,581 vs 431,840+46%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,318 vs 1,468+58%
- 5GYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- NFCYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
Why is Reno12 F 4G better than Moto G35?
- Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 2,100 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G35: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 166.3 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Leaf Green, Guava Red, Midnight Black, Sage Green | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 2,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 970 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 86.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T760 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 628,581 | 431,840 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,318 | 1,468 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | ColorOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 48 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
