android.gs
Compare
CMF Phone 1 vs Reno12 F 4G

Nothing CMF Phone 1 vs OPPO Reno12 F 4G

What CMF Phone 1 does better (7) and where Reno12 F 4G wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Nothing · 2024CMF Phone 1

7.1Score

7 advantages≈ $270

Higher score

OPPO · 2024Reno12 F 4G

6.9Score

13 advantages

8.2Display8.6

5.1Performance3.8

6.1Camera6.8

7.1Battery6.8

4.0Features4.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

CMF Phone 1Reno12 F 4G

	CMF Phone 1	Reno12 F 4G	Difference
Height	164 mm	163.1 mm	+0.9 mm
Width	77 mm	75.8 mm	+1.2 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	7.7 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	197 g	187 g	+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CMF Phone 1 better than Reno12 F 4G?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,801 vs 1,468+91%
AnTuTu score536,089 vs 431,840+24%
5GYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%

Why is Reno12 F 4G better than CMF Phone 1?

Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Stereo speakersNo · CMF Phone 1: Yes
Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · CMF Phone 1: Yes
Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+12%
Weight197 g vs 187 g+5%
Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 2,100 nits+5%
Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.7 mm+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Nothing CMF Phone 1≈ $2707.1	OPPO Reno12 F 4G6.9
Design
Weight	197 g	187 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	7.7 mm
Height	164 mm	163.1 mm
Width	77 mm	75.8 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Silicone polymer	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP52	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	IPx4
Glass protection	DragonTrail Pro	Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2
Colours	Black, Orange, Light Green	Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	2,100 nits
Measured brightness	1,259 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	85.1%	86.9%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7300	Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Adreno 610
AnTuTu score	536,089	431,840
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,801	1,468
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	851	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	—
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	16.2 h	—
Wired charging	33 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5
NFC	No	No
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-28 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Nothing OS 4.0	ColorOS 15
Major OS updates promised	2	—