How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno12 F 4G vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

OPPO Reno12 F 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

What Reno12 F 4G does better (7) and where Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno12 F 4G
OPPO · 2024Reno12 F 4G
6.9Score
7 advantages
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
7.0Score
10 advantages≈ $220
Higher score
8.6Display7.9
3.8Performance3.9
6.9Camera8.1
6.8Battery5.1
4.0Features4.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno12 F 4GRedmi Note 13 Pro 4G
75.8 × 163.17.775 × 161.18
Reno12 F 4GRedmi Note 13 Pro 4GDifference
Height163.1 mm161.1 mm+2 mm
Width75.8 mm75 mm+0.8 mm
Thickness7.7 mm8 mm−0.3 mm
Weight187 g188 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno12 F 4G better than Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?

  1. Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: No
  2. AnTuTu score431,840 vs 382,881+13%
  3. Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 1,300 nits+62%
  4. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
  5. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  6. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  7. Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%

Why is Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G better than Reno12 F 4G?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
  2. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  3. Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
  4. Optical stabilisationNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
  5. NFCNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,468 vs 1,844+26%
  7. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
  9. Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio86.9% vs 88.9%+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight187 g188 g
Thickness7.7 mm8 mm
Height163.1 mm161.1 mm
Width75.8 mm75 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackPlasticPlastic
Ingress protectionIP64IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Glass protectionAsahi Glass AGC DT-Star2Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursAmber Orange, Olive Green, Matte GreyMidnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,400 px
Pixel density395 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,100 nits1,300 nits
Measured brightness—1,047 nits
Screen-to-body ratio86.9%88.9%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process6 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score431,840382,881
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,4681,844
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size—1/1.4"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
4K video frame rate—30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—11.6 h
Wired charging45 W67 W
Charged in 30 min—94%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth55.2
NFCNoYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15HyperOS
Major OS updates promised—3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare