- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 Pro vs 14 Civi
OPPO Reno11 Pro vs Xiaomi 14 Civi
What Reno11 Pro does better (4) and where 14 Civi wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.6
7.7Performance8.1
8.3Camera8.8
6.3Battery4.2
7.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 Pro14 Civi
| Reno11 Pro | 14 Civi | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 157.2 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 72.8 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 178 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 Pro better than 14 Civi?
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 75%+80%
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz+3%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
Why is 14 Civi better than Reno11 Pro?
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 3,000 nits3.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,563 vs 5,352+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno11 Pro: Yes
- AnTuTu score1,292,987 vs 1,530,876+18%
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+2%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 460 ppi+17%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,236 px+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 157.2 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Cruise Blue, Matcha Green, Shadow Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,236 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,750 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,441 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,292,987 | 1,530,876 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,563 | 5,352 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,311 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.18 W/kg | 0.93 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HyperOS |
