- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 Pro vs V30 Pro
OPPO Reno11 Pro vs Vivo V30 Pro
What Reno11 Pro does better (4) and where V30 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display9.3
7.7Performance7.2
8.3Camera8.4
6.3Battery6.7
7.9Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 ProV30 Pro
| Reno11 Pro | V30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 164.4 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75.1 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 188 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 Pro better than V30 Pro?
- AnTuTu score1,292,987 vs 841,083+54%
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 70%+93%
- Weight181 g vs 188 g+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V30 Pro better than Reno11 Pro?
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 2,800 nits2.9×
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,563 vs 3,982+12%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC | Schott α glass |
| Colours | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Bloom White, Waving Aqua, Lush Green, Noble Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 2,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,197 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,292,987 | 841,083 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,563 | 3,982 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,815 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.18 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
