- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 Pro vs Reno14 Pro
OPPO Reno11 Pro vs OPPO Reno14 Pro
What Reno11 Pro does better (2) and where Reno14 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.8
7.7Performance8.7
8.3Camera9.6
6.3Battery9.5
7.9Features9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 ProReno14 Pro
| Reno11 Pro | Reno14 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.4 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 77 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 201 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 Pro better than Reno14 Pro?
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 73%+85%
- Weight181 g vs 201 g+11%
Why is Reno14 Pro better than Reno11 Pro?
- AnTuTu score1,292,987 vs 2,048,465+58%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,563 vs 6,406+80%
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+35%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · Reno11 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno11 Pro: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Optical zoom2× vs 3.5×+75%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,200 nits+26%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- eSIMNo · Reno11 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 450 ppi+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or Crystal Shield Glass |
| Colours | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Titanium Gray, Brilliant White (Opal White), Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,272 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,292,987 | 2,048,465 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,563 | 6,406 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 3.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 73% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.18 W/kg | 1.16 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
