- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno10 Pro vs Reno11 Pro
OPPO Reno10 Pro vs OPPO Reno11 Pro
What Reno10 Pro does better (0) and where Reno11 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.6
5.0Performance7.7
8.3Camera8.3
3.9Battery6.3
7.9Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno10 ProReno11 Pro
| Reno10 Pro | Reno11 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.1 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno10 Pro better than Reno11 Pro?
Reno10 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Reno11 Pro better than Reno10 Pro?
- AnTuTu score495,040 vs 1,292,9872.6×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,795 vs 3,563+27%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+29%
- 4K selfie videoNo · Reno10 Pro: Yes
- Weight185 g vs 181 g+2%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 135%+35%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.6 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Asahi Glass AGC |
| Colours | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple | Pearl White, Rock Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | 793 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 495,040 | 1,292,987 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,795 | 3,563 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 135% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.18 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
