android.gs
Compare
Reno11 Pro vs Pova 6 Pro

OPPO Reno11 Pro vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro

What Reno11 Pro does better (18) and where Pova 6 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2024Reno11 Pro

8.5Score

18 advantages≈ $460

Higher score

Tecno · 2024Pova 6 Pro

7.7Score

6 advantages≈ $440

7.6Display8.4

7.7Performance4.1

8.3Camera6.6

6.3Battery8.2

7.9Features6.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno11 ProPova 6 Pro

	Reno11 Pro	Pova 6 Pro	Difference
Height	162.4 mm	165.5 mm	−3.1 mm
Width	74.1 mm	76.1 mm	−2 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	7.9 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	181 g	198 g	−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno11 Pro better than Pova 6 Pro?

AnTuTu score1,292,987 vs 390,5563.3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,563 vs 1,890+89%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 6 Pro: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Pova 6 Pro: No
Wired charging80 W vs 70 W+14%
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+29%
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 6 Pro: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Pova 6 Pro: No
Charged in 30 min135% vs 75%+80%

Why is Pova 6 Pro better than Reno11 Pro?

Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+30%
Stereo speakersNo · Reno11 Pro: Yes
Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,300 nits+37%
Memory card slotNo · Reno11 Pro: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno11 Pro: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno11 Pro≈ $4608.5	Tecno Pova 6 Pro≈ $4407.7
Design
Weight	181 g	198 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	7.9 mm
Height	162.4 mm	165.5 mm
Width	74.1 mm	76.1 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	—	IP53
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx3
Glass protection	Asahi Glass AGC	—
Colours	Pearl White, Rock Grey	Comet Green, Meteorite Grey
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,412 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	950 nits	1,300 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,070 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.8%	87.2%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8200	Mediatek Dimensity 6080
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.1 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Mali-G610 MC6	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	1,292,987	390,556
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,563	1,890
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	373
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	108 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.52"
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,600 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	14.4 h
Wired charging	80 W	70 W
Charged in 30 min	135%	75%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	1.18 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	HIOS 14