android.gs
Compare
Reno10 Pro vs Poco F5 Pro

OPPO Reno10 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

What Reno10 Pro does better (7) and where Poco F5 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2023Reno10 Pro

7.6Score

7 advantages≈ $400

Xiaomi · 2023Poco F5 Pro

9.0Score

16 advantages≈ $400

Higher score

7.6Display8.6

5.0Performance7.6

8.3Camera9.2

3.9Battery8.6

7.9Features6.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno10 ProPoco F5 Pro

	Reno10 Pro	Poco F5 Pro	Difference
Height	162.3 mm	162.8 mm	−0.5 mm
Width	74.2 mm	75.4 mm	−1.2 mm
Thickness	7.9 mm	8.6 mm	−0.7 mm
Weight	185 g	204 g	−19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno10 Pro better than Poco F5 Pro?

Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F5 Pro: No
Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Weight185 g vs 204 g+10%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+9%
Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 87.5%+3%

Why is Poco F5 Pro better than Reno10 Pro?

AnTuTu score495,040 vs 1,057,9772.1×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Wireless chargingNo · Reno10 Pro: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Reno10 Pro: Yes
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,795 vs 4,001+43%
Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+12%
Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,400 nits+47%
Measured brightness793 nits vs 1,059 nits+34%
Pixel density394 ppi vs 526 ppi+34%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz+25%
Max video4K vs 8K

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno10 Pro≈ $4007.6	Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro≈ $4009.0
Design
Weight	185 g	204 g
Thickness	7.9 mm	8.6 mm
Height	162.3 mm	162.8 mm
Width	74.2 mm	75.4 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP53
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx3
Glass protection	Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple	Black, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,412 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	526 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	950 nits	1,400 nits
Measured brightness	793 nits	1,059 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.7%	87.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 642L	Adreno 730
AnTuTu score	495,040	1,057,977
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,795	4,001
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	2,110
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/2.0"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,600 mAh	5,160 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.1 h	—
Wired charging	80 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	100%	100%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	30 W
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-28.6 LUFS	-26.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	1 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	HyperOS 3