- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno10 Pro vs Reno8 Pro
OPPO Reno10 Pro vs OPPO Reno8 Pro
What Reno10 Pro does better (4) and where Reno8 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.6
5.0Performance6.6
8.3Camera7.1
3.9Battery5.8
7.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno10 ProReno8 Pro
| Reno10 Pro | Reno8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 161.2 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.2 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.3 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 183 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno10 Pro better than Reno8 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Reno8 Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Reno8 Pro: No
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+2%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is Reno8 Pro better than Reno10 Pro?
- AnTuTu score495,040 vs 718,351+45%
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno10 Pro: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,795 vs 3,395+21%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.85 GHz+19%
- Measured brightness793 nits vs 818 nits+3%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 135%+35%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Loudspeaker loudness-28.6 LUFS vs -25.5 LUFS+-11%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.3 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 183 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 161.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | 793 nits | 818 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 90.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.85 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 495,040 | 718,351 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,795 | 3,395 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,541 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 135% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.6 LUFS | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | ColorOS 14 |
