- android.gs
- Compare
- X9a vs Reno10 Pro
Honor X9a vs OPPO Reno10 Pro
What X9a does better (5) and where Reno10 Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.6
4.8Performance5.0
6.9Camera8.3
7.5Battery3.9
7.1Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9aReno10 Pro
| X9a | Reno10 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 162.3 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 175 g | 185 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9a better than Reno10 Pro?
- AnTuTu score605,759 vs 495,040+22%
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+11%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Measured brightness859 nits vs 793 nits+8%
- Weight175 g vs 185 g+6%
Why is Reno10 Pro better than X9a?
- Wired charging40 W vs 80 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · X9a: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · X9a: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,057 vs 2,795+36%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 950 nits+19%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min57% vs 100%+75%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | 859 nits | 793 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 605,759 | 495,040 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,057 | 2,795 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.1 h |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | ColorOS 15 |
