- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno10 Pro vs Power Armor 20WT
OPPO Reno10 Pro vs UleFone Power Armor 20WT
What Reno10 Pro does better (15) and where Power Armor 20WT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display4.0
8.3Camera5.5
3.9Battery8.7
7.9Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno10 ProPower Armor 20WT
| Reno10 Pro | Power Armor 20WT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.8 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 79.2 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 18.1 mm | −10.2 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 382 g | −197 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno10 Pro better than Power Armor 20WT?
- Wired charging80 W vs 33 W2.4×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Weight185 g vs 382 g2.1×
- OLED panelYes · Power Armor 20WT: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Power Armor 20WT: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Power Armor 20WT: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 18.1 mm2.3×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Power Armor 20WT: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 5.6″+19%
Why is Power Armor 20WT better than Reno10 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 10,850 mAh2.4×
- Memory card slotNo · Reno10 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 427 ppi+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 382 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 18.1 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 5.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 427 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 793 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 63.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 495,040 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,795 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 10,850 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
