- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno10 Pro vs Aquos sense7
OPPO Reno10 Pro vs Sharp Aquos sense7
What Reno10 Pro does better (13) and where Aquos sense7 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display6.8
8.3Camera6.7
3.9Battery3.1
7.9Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno10 ProAquos sense7
| Reno10 Pro | Aquos sense7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 152 mm | +10.3 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 70 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 158 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno10 Pro better than Aquos sense7?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Aquos sense7: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Aquos sense7: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.1″+10%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 83.7%+7%
Why is Aquos sense7 better than Reno10 Pro?
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,300 nits+37%
- Memory card slotNo · Reno10 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · Reno10 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno10 Pro: Yes
- Weight185 g vs 158 g+17%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 436 ppi+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 158 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 152 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 70 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | — |
| Colours | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IGZO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,432 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 436 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 793 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 83.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 495,040 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,795 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,570 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 11.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
