- android.gs
- Compare
- X7c 4G vs CMF Phone 1
Honor X7c 4G vs Nothing CMF Phone 1
What X7c 4G does better (9) and where CMF Phone 1 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
6.1Display8.2
5.6Camera6.1
8.0Battery7.1
5.5Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7c 4GCMF Phone 1
| X7c 4G | CMF Phone 1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 164 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 197 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7c 4G better than CMF Phone 1?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCYes · CMF Phone 1: No
- Stereo speakersYes · CMF Phone 1: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · CMF Phone 1: No
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+12%
Why is CMF Phone 1 better than X7c 4G?
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 2,000 nits2.4×
- OLED panelNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- 5GNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 395 ppi+51%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Tempered glass | DragonTrail Pro |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Forest Green, Moonlight White | Black, Orange, Light Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,259 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 85.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 536,089 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,801 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 851 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16.2 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | Nothing OS 4.0 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
