How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr+ 2024 vs Flip

Motorola Razr+ 2024 vs nubia Flip

What Razr+ 2024 does better (15) and where Flip wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr+ 2024
Motorola · 2024Razr+ 2024
7.0Score
15 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
nubia Flip
nubia · 2024Flip
4.8Score
3 advantages≈ $320
9.1Display8.0
5.7Camera3.1
4.8Battery3.8
8.4Features3.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr+ 2024Flip
74 × 171.47.175.5 × 1707
Razr+ 2024FlipDifference
Height171.4 mm170 mm+1.4 mm
Width74 mm75.5 mm−1.5 mm
Thickness7.1 mm7 mm+0.1 mm
Weight189 g214 g−25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr+ 2024 better than Flip?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
  2. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  3. Optical stabilisationYes · Flip: No
  4. Telephoto cameraYes · Flip: No
  5. Wireless chargingYes · Flip: No
  6. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  7. Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
  8. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  9. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  10. 4K selfie videoYes · Flip: No
  11. eSIMYes · Flip: No
  12. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+20%

Why is Flip better than Razr+ 2024?

  1. Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,310 mAh+8%
  2. Pixel density413 ppi vs 439 ppi+6%
  3. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,188 px+10%
Specifications

Side by side

nubia Flipnubia Flip≈ $3204.8
Design
Weight189 g214 g
Thickness7.1 mm7 mm
Height171.4 mm170 mm
Width74 mm75.5 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIPX8IP42
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx2
ColoursMidnight Blue, Hot Pink, Spring Green, Peach Fuzz, Paris Hilton EditionSunshine Golden, Cosmic Black
Display
Screen size6.9″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,188 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,790 px
Pixel density413 ppi439 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits—
Measured brightness1,253 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%85.7%
HDRYes—
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 644
AnTuTu score1,158,987—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,601—
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7—
Main sensor size1/1.95"—
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,000 mAh4,310 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Wired charging45 W33 W
Charged in 30 min78%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerproximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UI—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare