- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr+ 2024 vs Galaxy Z Flip6
Motorola Razr+ 2024 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
What Razr+ 2024 does better (10) and where Galaxy Z Flip6 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display5.8
5.9Performance6.6
5.7Camera4.0
4.8Battery3.1
8.4Features8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr+ 2024Galaxy Z Flip6
| Razr+ 2024 | Galaxy Z Flip6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.4 mm | 165.1 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 71.9 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 187 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr+ 2024 better than Galaxy Z Flip6?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy Z Flip6: No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 2,600 nits+15%
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Charged in 30 min78% vs 50%+56%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy Z Flip6 better than Razr+ 2024?
- AnTuTu score1,158,987 vs 1,400,594+21%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,601 vs 6,265+12%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr+ 2024: Yes
- Measured brightness1,253 nits vs 1,475 nits+18%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.39 GHz+13%
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 426 ppi+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Thickness7.1 mm vs 6.9 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 171.4 mm | 165.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 71.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Midnight Blue, Hot Pink, Spring Green, Peach Fuzz, Paris Hilton Edition | Yellow, Silver Shadow, Mint, Blue, Black, White, Peach |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 426 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,253 nits | 1,475 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 85.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.39 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,158,987 | 1,400,594 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,601 | 6,265 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,487 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.6 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip66.96.4
vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip65.56.4vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.46.9vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsTecno Phantom V Fold26.46.5
vsGoogle Pixel FoldvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip66.66.4vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsTecno Phantom V Flip26.45.7