- android.gs
- Compare
- Flip vs Phantom V Flip2
nubia Flip vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2
What Flip does better (4) and where Phantom V Flip2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display6.0
3.1Camera5.2
3.8Battery6.2
3.3Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
FlipPhantom V Flip2
| Flip | Phantom V Flip2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170 mm | 170.8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 73.4 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.6 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 196 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flip better than Phantom V Flip2?
- Dual SIMYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- Pixel density439 ppi vs 413 ppi+6%
- Resolution (width)1,188 px vs 1,080 px+10%
- Thickness7 mm vs 7.6 mm+9%
Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than Flip?
- Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Flip: Yes
- Battery capacity4,310 mAh vs 4,720 mAh+10%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Flip: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Weight214 g vs 196 g+9%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 170 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Sunshine Golden, Cosmic Black | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,188 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,790 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 439 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 893 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 85.9% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 775,306 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,544 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,247 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 4,720 mAh |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
