How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 40 Ultra vs Flip

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs nubia Flip

What Razr 40 Ultra does better (13) and where Flip wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola · 2023Razr 40 Ultra
5.0Score
13 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
nubia Flip
nubia · 2024Flip
4.8Score
5 advantages≈ $320
6.5Display8.0
5.4Camera3.1
3.1Battery3.8
3.5Features3.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 40 UltraFlip
74 × 170.8775.5 × 1707
Razr 40 UltraFlipDifference
Height170.8 mm170 mm+0.8 mm
Width74 mm75.5 mm−1.5 mm
Thickness7 mm7 mm=
Weight184 g214 g−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 40 Ultra better than Flip?

  1. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Optical stabilisationYes · Flip: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Flip: No
  5. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  6. CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+28%
  7. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Flip: No
  8. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  9. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  10. 4K selfie videoYes · Flip: No
  11. eSIMYes · Flip: No
  12. Weight184 g vs 214 g+16%

Why is Flip better than Razr 40 Ultra?

  1. Main camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
  2. Battery capacity3,800 mAh vs 4,310 mAh+13%
  3. Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
  4. Pixel density413 ppi vs 439 ppi+6%
  5. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,188 px+10%
Specifications

Side by side

nubia Flipnubia Flip≈ $3204.8
Design
Weight184 g214 g
Thickness7 mm7 mm
Height170.8 mm170 mm
Width74 mm75.5 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP52IP42
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2IPx2
ColoursInfinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta, Peach FuzzSunshine Golden, Cosmic Black
Display
Screen size6.9″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,188 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,790 px
Pixel density413 ppi439 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits—
Measured brightness1,050 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio85.1%85.7%
HDRYes—
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.19 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 644
AnTuTu score975,461—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,645—
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera12 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.5—
Main sensor size1/2.55"—
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity3,800 mAh4,310 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Wired charging30 W33 W
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power5 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.4 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only)proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised3—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare