- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Phantom V Fold2
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (23) and where Phantom V Fold2 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display6.3
8.4Performance5.6
6.6Camera5.8
8.4Battery7.0
8.4Features3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraPhantom V Fold2
| Razr 60 Ultra | Phantom V Fold2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 159 mm | +12.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 140.4 mm | −66.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.1 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 249 g | −50 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Phantom V Fold2?
- AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,158,040+58%
- Measured brightness1,489 nits vs 573 nits2.6×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,938 vs 2,5592.3×
- Active use (test)15.2 h vs 9.6 h+58%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 4,327+57%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%
- Weight199 g vs 249 g+25%
Why is Phantom V Fold2 better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,750 mAh+22%
- Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 60 Ultra: Yes
- Wired charging68 W vs 70 W+3%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Screen size7″ vs 7.8″+12%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 2,000 px+63%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.1 mm+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 88.2%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 249 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.1 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 159 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 140.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Karst Green, Rippling Blue |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 7.8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 2,000 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,296 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | 573 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 88.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | 1,158,040 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | 4,327 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | 2,559 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,750 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | 9.6 h |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | HiOS 14 Fold |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 29.18.7
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9.15.0
vs
Xiaomi Mix FlipvsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.19.1
vs
Honor Magic V Flip 2vsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.99.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsTecno Phantom V Fold26.46.5
